Будинок як історична цінність міста

Abstract

UK: Проаналізовано вплив модерних віянь на архітектуру міста та зроблено спробу проаналізувати значимість будинку як архітектурної цінності.

EN: Statement of the problem. The rapid development of the construction sector, the latest on new technologies and the many historic architectural sites of the city is such that deserve special attention. Each of them — it's history, culture, great intellectual contribution of a particular creator. But often overlooked specialists are really valuable and unique features in terms of architecture. These buildings are disappearing from the map of the city, so this question remains relevant today.

The aim of the paper is to explore the importance of building a historical value for the city.

Conclusions. Now Nepokoychytskoho estate is in a terrible state. Stairs that previously led to the garden is scattered, they fly away chunks of concrete and plaster. In some places visible metal frame. Despite the fact that people like the house, none taken initiative to repair interesting architectural details. It's not spreading further short articles on various urban sites. For local authorities, this house is no historical value, because it is for residential status. What is measured historical value of buildings? Why authorities drew attention to the status of the building, not to its architectural and artistic value? Why not mod wants to keep the house in 1913? Because I do not want to allocate funds. Many historic sites have been lost due to inactivity city authorities. If we continue to rely on others, who knows how many interesting architectural sites still lose. Maybe it's time to bring the situation under control, to raise funds for materials and revive architectural decoration on the stairs? It will not solve the global problem of decadence Katerynoslav in general, but this move will help save one of the jewels of the city and serve as an example to others, will be something like a chain reaction.